← Model comparison

Full results

All 189 questions, each answered by 7 model backends and scored by 4 independent judges — 1,323 answers in total. Browse by category, or download the raw result files.

By category

Where the job is hardest, across every model. Each row is the share of all 7 models’ answers in that category that fell into each of the four states. Percentages, because the categories differ in size; every row sums to 100.

CategoryQuestions ConfirmedProvisional ContestedFailed
Out of Scope2081% 14%2%3%
Edge Cases & Adversarial2370% 12%9%9%
Privacy & Data Handling862% 23%7%7%
Experience & Credentials2860% 23%9%8%
Services & Capabilities3052% 30%13%5%
How We Work2551% 19%12%18%
Tool Usage2547% 23%15%14%
Fit Assessment3036% 38%12%14%

Raw data

One file per model, containing every question, response, per-judge score and reason, token count, latency and cost.

The same four states as above, reported here as cumulative bounds rather than shares — the question is how well each model did, not how hard each category is. Confirmed is the floor; likely adds provisional; ceiling adds contested as well; failed is the other end. Breadth is the gap between confirmed and ceiling — how much the panel could not settle, which is a different question from how much a model got right. Confirmed, breadth and failed account for all 189 questions.

ModelQuestions Confirmed Likely Ceiling Breadth Failed Accuracy GroundednessDownload
Claude Opus 5189148 78%171 90%172 91%2417 9%90.5%92.7%JSON
Claude Sonnet 5189146 77%179 95%186 98%403 2%95.8%94.6%JSON
GPT-5.5189146 77%178 94%186 98%403 2%95.2%94.7%JSON
Claude Sonnet 4.6189113 60%164 87%180 95%679 5%90.7%89.9%JSON
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite18978 41%135 71%166 88%8823 12%81.6%82.1%JSON
Qwen 3 235B18956 30%110 58%144 76%8845 24%70.4%72.7%JSON
Gemini 3.5 Flash18948 25%112 59%156 83%10833 17%74.5%74.1%JSON